Saturday, February 7, 2009

OBAMA USURPING THE CONSTITUTION???

No joke on this one (wish it was). If this article is correct, it looks like the Obama administration, for the first time in U.S. history, will attempt to game the census data coming up in 2010, which has implications on redrawing congressional districts, federal spending, etc. This does NOT look good. It seems to me that, had this happened anytime in the past 8 years, the outcry in the MSM would have been deafening. Instead, their silence is. From the article:

The United States Census is a decennial census mandated by the United States Constitution.[1] The population is enumerated every 10 years and the results are used to allocate Congressional seats (congressional apportionment), electoral votes, and government program funding.[2] Some states or local jurisdictions also conduct local censuses.

The census is performed by the United States Census Bureau. The first census after the American Revolution was taken in 1790 under Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson; there have been 21 federal censuses since that time.[2] The last national census was held in 2000, and the next census is scheduled for 2010.
Talking heads had this to say (HT:GatewayPundit):


Why the potential for political gaming? Here's why. The electoral shift seems to be a net negative for Obama and a net positive for red states.

So I ask once again, how could the press be ignoring this???

2 comments:

  1. Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution as well as weaken its national defense, COUPLED WITH HIS UNPRECEDENTED WHITE HOUSE TAKEOVER OF DECENNIAL CENSUS TAKING FROM THE COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, has confirmed the very threats to our Republic’s survival that the Constitution was designed to avert, it no longer is sustainable for the United States Supreme Court and Military Joint Chiefs to refrain from exercising WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM UNLAWFUL USURPATION. The questions of Obama’s Kenyan birth and his father’s Kenyan/British citizenship (admitted on his own website) have been conflated by his sustained unwillingnes to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal, and compounded by his internet posting of a discredited ‘after-the-fact’ short form ‘certificate’. In the absence of these issues being acknowledged and addressed, IT IS MANIFEST THAT OBAMA REMAINS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment ‘citizen’ is not sufficient. A ‘President’ MUST BE an Article 2 ‘natural born citizen’ AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The problem here, of course, is that it is the job of CONGRESS to check these things. As you are no doubt aware, several court challenges have been dismissed prescisely for this reason. They gave the individual U.S> citizen simply no standing to go forward with such a challenge.

    ReplyDelete